Patient consent and shared decision-making for blood transfusion

Patient consent and shared decision-making for blood transfusion

The recent release of updated UK guidelines from SaBTO1 on patient consent and shared decision-making for blood transfusion serve to reinforce the importance of continuing efforts in Australia to enhance the provision of information to patients about blood transfusion and PBM practices, ensure an effective process for obtaining patients' consent and support shared decision-making.  

Informed consent for transfusion within Australian health services must reflect current local, jurisdictional and national consent requirements. Some national resources to support informed consent processes for transfusion include: 

Lifeblood and state/territory-based PBM programs have consumer information resources on transfusion, including translations, that may be suitable for use in your health service: 

A recent publication in the MJA, ‘From words to action: time for Australia to take shared decision-making implementation seriously’2, highlights that shared decision-making in Australia is not widely adopted in practice, calling for urgent scaling up so that more individuals and the health system can benefit from it. The article outlines currently available resources and initiatives as well as opportunities for progress.  

Some shared decision-making resources include: 

References 

  1. Murphy MF, Carson D, Davies A, Ditcham S, Donald G, Graham R, et al. Guidelines from the expert advisory committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) on patient consent and shared decision-making for blood transfusion. Br J Haematol. 2025;00:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70075
  2. TC Hoffmann TC, McCaffery KJ, Légaré F, Bakhit M and Tracy M, For the Australian Shared Decision Making Research Network. From words to action: time for Australia to take shared decision making implementation seriously, Med J Aust 2025; 223 (8): 391-396. |https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70065